Impact Stories
Home > Impact Stories > Mapping Parkinson’s care

June 2026
Parkinson’s disease is the second most common neurological condition worldwide, yet it remains one of the least understood.
Around 200,000 Australians are currently living with Parkinson’s disease. The condition occurs when dopamine-producing brain cells are damaged or lost, leading to symptoms such as tremors, stiffness, slowed movement and balance problems. While the risk of developing Parkinson’s increases with age, genetic and environmental factors also contribute. Early diagnosis and timely access to appropriate medication are critical to maintaining quality of life.
Geography shapes Parkinson’s care
For Dr Peter Micalos, senior lecturer in anatomy and physiology at Charles Sturt University, a central question was whether location determines access to appropriate Parkinson’s treatment.
“Understanding how care differs depending on where people live is crucial. Without that insight, it’s very difficult to ensure patients are receiving equitable and effective treatment,” Dr Micalos said.
Using linked health data, Dr Micalos and colleagues uncovered significant differences in Parkinson’s medication prescribing across New South Wales.
Their study found differences in the proportion of levodopa and levodopa combination prescriptions, the gold standard medications for managing Parkinson’s disease. Specifically, prescribing rates for these medications were lower in regional and remote areas compared with major cities, highlighting a geographic disparity.
Moreover, people living in metropolitan areas are more likely to have access to neurologists who can provide timely diagnosis, monitor disease progression and optimise medication regimens. In contrast, those living hundreds of kilometres from specialist services may rely primarily on general practitioners to manage a progressive neurological condition, potentially resulting in delayed treatment adjustments and less effective symptom control.
Why specialist access matters
“Parkinson’s disease is a complex, progressive condition, and managing it effectively requires access to specialist knowledge and ongoing review of treatment. When that access is limited, it can directly affect patient outcomes,” Dr Micalos said.
The findings highlight a challenge faced by many Australians with chronic and complex conditions: access to specialist care. And the consequences can be substantial. Reduced mobility, difficulties performing everyday activities, impacts on employment, and decreased social participation can affect not only individuals living with Parkinson’s, but also their families, carers and communities.
Pharmaceutical therapy remains the cornerstone of Parkinson’s disease management, helping people maintain independence and quality of life. It is often complemented by non-pharmaceutical interventions such as physiotherapy and speech therapy.
These treatment disparities had remained largely invisible until researchers were able to link data sources through Data Connect Australia-funded infrastructure.
Using the Secure Unified Research[RG1.1][RG1.2][RG1.3] Environment (SURE), supported by Data Connect Australia., the research team securely linked data from the Sax Institute’s 45 and Up Study with Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme records spanning 2004–2017. This enabled researchers to identify who was receiving Parkinson’s medications, what treatments were being prescribed, and how access varied across geographic regions—insights that would not have been possible from any single dataset.
“Linked data allows us to look beyond individual cases and understand patterns of care across entire populations. That’s essential for identifying inequities and informing better health policy,” he said.
Building a more equitable future
The study provides clear evidence to support initiatives aimed at improving equitable access to Parkinson’s care, including strengthening specialist outreach services and enhancing support and training for general practitioners in regional and rural communities.
The need for action is growing. Parkinson’s prevalence in Australia is projected to increase by 79 per cent by 2034. Dr Micalos says improving access to expertise and upskilling GPs could play an important role in ensuring all Australians with Parkinson’s receive the best possible care, regardless of where they live.
“Future research should focus on evaluating models of integrated care and exploring how outreach and digital health services can better support patients in rural and remote communities. The goal is to ensure that access improvements translate into meaningful improvements in quality of life,” Dr Micalos said.
By revealing previously hidden treatment inequalities, linked data is helping researchers and policymakers identify where improvements are needed most—and supporting a more equitable future for people living with Parkinson’s disease.

More information
P. A. Logan, P. S. Micalos, S. Fealy, M. Bramble, and A. Wong, “Comparing Parkinson’s Disease Medications Categorised by Location in New South Wales, Australia: Linking the 45 and Up Study and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) Data,” Australian Journal of Rural Health 33, no. 5 (2025): e70094. Read here
Privacy and security
Privacy protection and data security lie at the heart of Data Connect Australia. The collection, use and disclosure of personal information by government agencies and other agencies are bound by strict legislative and regulatory conditions. Researchers wishing to access linked data must also adhere to stringent conditions, including ethics approval, data custodian approval and the development of a detailed data security plan.
Researchers are typically given access to a linked data set put together to meet the specific needs of their project. This de-identified data includes only the minimum information required for the research, such as age rather than date of birth. Government agencies handle personal information in highly secure environments. Data is delivered to researchers through a secure remote access facility, ensuring no information is stored on the researcher’s personal computer or their institutional network.
Researchers cannot export raw data from this system, only their analyses, and these are checked. Researchers must only use the data for the approved purpose and are not allowed to link any other information. At the conclusion of the project, all data must be destroyed or returned. Penalties for researchers and government employees can include criminal conviction, jail time or substantial fines. In the more than ten years since the network began, there has never been a breach.

